Math Goodies is a free math help portal for students, teachers, and parents.
|
Interactive Math Goodies Software

testing left nav
Math Forums @ Math Goodies
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Members | Search | FAQ
 All Forums  Homework Help Forums  Pre-Calculus and Calculus  show e ^ln x = x not graphically New Topic  Reply to Topic  Printer Friendly
Author  Topic

ckitout
New Member

USA
2 Posts

 Posted - 05/20/2008 :  06:14:26 I need to be able to show the steps and justifications for proving e^ln x = x

skeeter

USA
5634 Posts

 Posted - 05/20/2008 :  08:36:24 let y = eln(x)take the log of both sides ...ln(y) = ln[eln(x)]using the power property of logs ...ln(y) = ln(x)*ln(e)since ln(e) = 1 ...ln(y) = ln(x)so ... y = x.

newton
Junior Member

USA
4 Posts

 Posted - 05/25/2008 :  16:23:10 Another approach:Let's look at e^ln 10ln 10 means the power of 'e' required to give 10.That power is 2.302585..So e^ln 10 = e^2.302585.. = 10.Similarlye^ln 5 = e^1.609437.. = 5e^ln xln x is the power of 'e' that will give 'x'Call that power 'k'e^ln x = e^k = xe^ln x = x.Look also at common logs:10^log 100 = 10^2 = 100etc.

Ultraglide

299 Posts

 Posted - 05/29/2008 :  17:41:39 Just a note - the domain of lnx is x>0, so you only get the portion of y=x where x>0.

pitoten
Average Member

USA
8 Posts

 Posted - 03/31/2010 :  02:08:29 How about this?let a real number (a) = ln (x) (x>0)putting this into exponential form, we gete^a = x, and subbing (a) back in from above, we get e^(ln x) = x!!! Edited by - pitoten on 03/31/2010 02:12:22

Hawkster93
New Member

Lebanon
1 Posts

 Posted - 07/19/2013 :  16:35:10 Another way to prove that e^ln x = x is as follows :for each x>0, if we derive e^ln x we get:d/dx ( e^ln x)=(1/x)*(e^ln x)if we divide by e^ln x and multiplying by dx on each side (noting that e^ln x is "always" different from zero) we get:d(e^ln x)/(e^ln x) = dx/x Now we integrate both sides to get :ln (e^ln x) = ln x (1), but the natural log function is a bijection so for each x>0, if ln u = ln v ---> u=v, we conclude from (1) that e^ln x = x. :]

someguy

143 Posts

 Posted - 07/28/2013 :  14:06:25 Hawkster, you need a constant of integration. Then show it is zero by evaluating at x=0.Also, you have to worry about how you know the derivatives of the natural log and exponential functions. If you justified one derivative and then used this result to show the other, you shouldn't then use the derivatives to justify this equality.If you can show how to find the derivatives of both ln(x) and exp(x) without using the fact that they are functional inverses of one another, then yes, you can use your knowledge of their derivatives to verify that they are functional inverses of each other.(The last comment is due to your use of the word prove. Since you talk about bijections, you should be advanced enough to see this is not being unnecessarily picky.)

nikkor180
New Member

USA
1 Posts

 Posted - 12/18/2013 :  19:37:37 Would a most simple proof not simply employ the definition of a logarithm? That is,Definition: Let b, x > 0 with b not=1. logb[x] = y if and only if b^y = x.Therefore, the proof is as follows:By convention, loge[x] = ln x. Hence employing the preceding definition literally, gives e^(ln x) = [x].Rich Edited by - nikkor180 on 12/18/2013 19:40:31
Topic
 New Topic  Reply to Topic  Printer Friendly Jump To: Select Forum New Visitor Forum       Testing Forum Homework Help Forums       Basic Math and Pre-Algebra       Algebra       Geometry and Trigonometry       Pre-Calculus and Calculus       Probability and Statistics       Standardized Test Preparation Help       Miscellaneous Math Topics Educator Forum       Teacher Talk Parent Forum       Parent's Place  -------------------- Home Active Topics Frequently Asked Questions Member Information Search Page
 Math Forums @ Math Goodies © 2000-2004 Snitz Communications